● 10.20.22

Gemini version available ♊︎

●● Microsoft-Funded ‘Analysts’: Microsoft is Popular, Based on Microsoft Data (Projects That Choose Microsoft’s Proprietary Hosting)

Posted in Deception, Microsoft at 6:00 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

“Analysts sell out – that’s their business model… But they are very concerned that they never look like they are selling out, so that makes them very prickly to work with.”

–Microsoft, internal document [PDF]

Microsoft, internal document

Published minutes ago: (link intentionally omitted)

Image: Redmonk's BS

Summary: Stephen O’Grady and Rachel Stephens, failing to disclose that Microsoft pays them (conflict of interest at Redmonk, as usual), assess programming languages’ popularity using… Microsoft’s own data, as usual (they’ve done this for years). If one assesses the trends and usage levels only of projects which choose Microsoft as their master (and proprietary development tools), what does one actually measure*?

___* We have repeatedly cautioned (since 2018) and also demonstrated that GitHub would be used for propaganda through false statistics (licences, programming languages, censorship of particular viewpoints and projects, supposed ‘popularity’, and so on).

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink > Image: Mail

 Send this to a friend

Permalink
↺ Send this to a friend

----------

Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.