● 12.10.09

●● Microsoft’s and Novell’s “Fauxpen Source”

Posted in Free/Libre Software, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Mono, Novell at 11:41 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Summary: The fake cases of Free/open source software named a top issue for 2010

DANA Blankenhorn has written a provocative short piece about the increasing number of open source fakers, which happen to include Microsoft. In part he says:

↺ provocative short piece
When there’s an open source “community” version and a paid “enterprise” version of the same software, what is the difference between writing a check for enterprise support and just buying a closed source license?

Another type of “fake” would be “Open Source” that requires a whole stack of proprietary software to run on. The Source has expanded Blankenhorn’s thoughts and pointed out that therein lies the real problem which deserves the name “fauxpen source”.

↺ expanded Blankenhorn’s thoughts
Is there any better answer than a wolf in sheep’s clothing? (Again, I beg for the help of a skilled graphic artist!)That’s what fauxpen source is after all: an attempt to shroud restrictive software in the appearance of open-ness. We see it when so-called “open” projects are under exclusive “covenants” and “promises” – is that really “Open Source”? How about some restrictive trademark / logo / name / credit requirements? Or perhaps the source is available, but does not allow any community contributions?It seems to be that some people consider it a “win” if the absolute minimum standard to claim the term “Open Source” is met, despite any additional restrictions/requirements. As if the term itself is what is important.

Last month we wrote about Microsoft’s Orchard/Oxite [1, 2, 3], which is a good example of Microsoft’s “fauxpen source”. It only runs on Microsoft’s proprietary stack, which is so unreliable that the London Stock Exchange (LSE) had to dump it. Mary Jo Foley has been one of the very few Microsoft bloggers who promoted (and still promote) Orchard/Oxite and there is hardly any response to it — implying lack of interest — except this one comment (at the time of writing), which says:

1
2
3
had to dump it
↺ promoted (and still promote) Orchard/Oxite
↺ this one comment
it’s just a ‘me too’ M$ gimmick to use open source and avoid patent infringement law suits.

Speaking of .NET gimmicks, Novell’s Marek Safar has just announced more of them. Oddly enough, some Linux sites offer it coverage. Mono is more like "Open Core", which is a form of “fauxpen source”. █

↺ Marek Safar
↺ more of them
↺ Linux sites
more like "Open Core"

“Now [Novell is] little better than a branch of Microsoft”

–LinuxToday Managing Editor

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

Permalink
↺ Send this to a friend

----------

Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.