● 08.30.07
●● Dissecting Microsoft’s OOXML/ODF Strategy
Posted in America, Apple, Asia, Bill Gates, Corel, Deals, Deception, Europe, Formats, Linspire, Novell, Office Suites, Open XML, OpenDocument, Standard, Steve Ballmer, Xandros at 11:33 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
A while ago, I was attempting to formulate and visualise the sorts of strategies that Microsoft might be chalking on its boards. I produced a mindmap a couple of weeks ago and MattD dissected the Microsoft/Novell deal. The mindmap goes beyond ODF/OOXML aspects and shows how Microsoft uses deals (proxies) to eventually get its way.
A discussion that I had in Linux Journal brought up some new facts and a train of thought. I then decided to focus on OOXML/ODF in isolation. Here are some of methods which Microsoft has so far used in order to battle ODF and promote its own enablement of vendor lock-in.
Recruitment of members/voters/bloggers (some of which are anonymous)Linux companies: Turbolinux, Novell, Xandors, Linspire (binding contract involves OOXML)Corel dealApple cross-licensing deal; using iWorks as ‘proof’ that OOXML is possible (never mind if support is read-only and very poor)Politicians: Ballmer and Gates phone US politicians to flip votes and stack/group opposersGates visits China, invites ministers to his home, and offers discounts/favoursHungarian minister calls for a new vote on OOXML(this time with Microsoft partners)New countries emerge out of oblivion and decide to vote on OOXML (easy “Yes” voters to persuade or even ‘buy’)Possibly (solid proof still required): charity in India and investments in VietnamLies and deception, e.g. telling people ‘election date’ is a month or so later. This way, they don’t turn up or never truly decide based on technical understanding.Ecma-related disinformation, CompTIA FUD (among other lobbying arms such as the ISC)Studies and paid-for ‘research’ (IDC)Making deliberate accusations and lies while those who can defend or rebut are on vacationPress releases that are incomplete and/or deceptive (e.g. bending the meaning of “choice” and “open”)Lies (or exaggeration) about third-party products (e.g. AbiWord) supporting OOXML, assuming that Microsoft Office is OOXML and vice versaShutting out rival companies (Portugal, Sweden, Germany, Sweden, and more)Letters calling for support disseminated among (and by) Microsoft partnersPhonecalls and E-mails sent to Microsoft partners for more lobbying muscleMicrosoft creating Web sites and grossroots petitions (e.g. in the UK), then asking partners to show pseudo support by signing and participatingLobbying/bullying (e.g. “Men in Black” incident in Florida)Use of FUD in Congress, e.g. talks about budget failures that are not even related to ODF (diversion of discussed topic and a political debate replacing a technical one)CIO shuffles, e.g. in MassachusettsUse of connections in media, e.g. publicity stunts in the BBC (now influenced heavily by Microsoft, whose departing executives now work for the BBC)Use of connections in governments, e.g. UK National Archives, whose head chose OOXML for storage and preservation. This head happens to have two hats and one of them is a senior Microsoft position. He puts national archives (i.e. crucial public data) in the hands of Microsoft and their lock-ins.Spamming ANSI
All of these issues have already been covered in the site. Binding the appropriate hyperlinks to them would take quite some time, but if you require a pointer, fire away and we’ll provise it.
Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Permalink Send this to a friend
----------
➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.