● 05.28.07

●● If You Lack Good Software, Then Produce “Scareware”

Posted in FUD, Microsoft, Novell, Windows at 7:19 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

ComputerWorld has an article which coins an interesting new term — “scareware”. It explains why vapourware tactics are ineffective, so they are being replaced by something more aggressive, which can possibly compensate for lack of innovation. Have a look at this new fragment of text.

↺ vapourware tactics
↺ something more aggressive

>

>

Microsoft talks a lot about innovation. It innovated the Xbox, several years after everyone else; it innovated the Zune, several years after everyone else; it innovated the GUI, several years after Apple (okay, and Xerox); it innovated Hotmail … oh, alright, it bought Hotmail. Bill Gates famously missed the internet revolution and then innovated the web browser, several years after Netscape.

>

[...]

>

In the meantime, though, the company that brought us vapourware has innovated yet another new product: scareware (oh, okay, a couple of years after SCO).

>

In another new interview, the man at the top of the Linux Foundation confirms this.

↺ confirms this

>

>

Question: How do you respond to the theory that it’s all part of Microsoft’s plan to pull the rug out from under Red Hat?

>

Zemlin: I don’t think they’re really targeting anyone here. It’s just really about the FUD.

>

Remember that Novell is a passive part — a cogwheel if you like — in the use of intimidation. You may also wish to see his BusinessWeek rebuttal, which Shane covered last week.

↺ passive part
↺ Shane covered last week

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink  Send this to a friend

Permalink
↺ Send this to a friend

----------

Techrights

➮ Sharing is caring. Content is available under CC-BY-SA.