A Proper Election System

And the reason that party-based votes are bad.

Preface

It was only when I was 16 years old, that I have started to examine the descisions of parliament members of parties that I tend or potentially tend to advocate and vote for.

The reason for which I have started at the age of 16 was because I could vote at the age of 17 which was due to the year of the expected general elections. This reason, of course, is not a good reason; and examining descisions of representatives must occur at the age of 5, at the very least.

The first political party to which I have voted for was "Shinui" (Hebrew: שינוי), which was a non-religious Jewish political party which opposes to coercion of religion, and particularly, against forcing the Jewish religious lifestyle, including Kosher marks on commodities, upon people who did not want that.

This time, the party, including "Chetz" (Hebrew: חץ) did not surpass the threshhold, and thereby did not enter to parliament.

In fact, all the political parties to which I that voted for thereafter did not enter to the parliament, because non has surpassed the threshhold.

I have voted, by my own will, only twice in my life, at the ages of 17 and 20.

Ironically, I did vote (first irony) a few times more, because my Rabbi has asked and constantly petition me to vote for his religious (second irony) political party of choice, "Gimel" (Hebrew: גימל).

For over a decade, I do not vote at all.

Problems

The problems with political parties, including the parties that I have voted for, or supportive of.

Agents

Covert agents is probably the wost problem of all.

There is always, at least, one intelligence officer, or more, depends on the size of the party, including Arab parties.

The head or leader (or more accurately, a misleader) of the party is often an intelligence officer.

Intelligence officer could also be manifested into influence in additional forms:

• as a party member; or

• as a mate of a party member; or

• as a sibling or a party member; or

• as an ancestor of a party member; or

• as a descendant of a party member; or

• as a relative; or

• as an employee.

Such relations are sometimes publicly known, yet more often are kept secret from the public awareness, and also erased from records.

The involvement of agents generally sabotages the will of the people who have voted for a given party.

Thereby, the parliamentary process is not effective, and the democratic aspect therefore is nullified.

Most of the agents are employed and thereby loyal to a so called ministry which is called The Prime Minister Office which is of the so called Prime Minister.

This means that the so called Prime Minister is the actual President, even though that is not the supposed state of affairs, according to display that is officially and publicly presented to the public.

The democratic process is easily sobotaged when a given regime is not a republic, especially when it has no constitution.

Most, if not all, of the Presidents, Prime Ministers and Ministers were employed by The Prime Minister Office.

There is only one party, The Prime Minister Office.

Depending how you observe or percieve it, either you always vote to that party, or your vote never counts.

Result

Not only that this is not a republic, it is not even a democracy.

This is a malicious, rigged, and fake system.

This is the only reason due to which you must boycott the regime, and not to vote.

Collective

Party based elections means that:

• Your representative of choice might not be elected to parliament.

• Your representative of choice might be later expelled from the party by the head of the party.

• You would have to capitulate and compromise, to vote to a party which you do not supportive of, because there is party one member which you want to be elected.

• You would have to waive your vote, because there is at least one member which you are not interested to be elected, either due to distrust, felony, or other doubts.

Trouble

This is a consequent problem of the actual problem.

Division

Some people would instill resentment in you.

They will tell you, that if the religious parties would win, they will get most of the money, as if there are not religious groups who boycott the state, along with its so called welfare programs.

Fear

Some people would instill fear in you.

They will tell you, that if the Arabs win, there will be more terrorism, as if everything that Arabs do is terrorism, even though most of the security agencies mostly employ Arabs.

Idiocy

After the election day, people would further ask you whether you have voted.

To realize it, suppose that a voter is not in favour of leftists, and you seem to be as a fellow who appears to be so too.

You would then be reached by that voter, who would then ask you:

It is good to see you. How are you? Did you vote?

You would then say:

No. I did not vote.

The voter would then exlain to you (i.e. repeat an opinion that was foisted by the media or press) that:

By not voting, you are voting against yourself.

The voter would further elaborate, that:

Because you did not vote, someone else has gained your vote.

WARNING! This is a trap to comply, submit and support the rigged system.

If the voter is aware of your political view, he might further explicitly mention that:

The leftists took advantage of the apathy of the public, and now they are stronger than they could have been otherwise.

Summary

Unfortunately, those people, unknowingly and unwillingly, are instruments of propaganda and disinformation to influence you to vote in the next expected elections, and by that to submit to the phony system.

Solution

Suppose that you are a religiously driven town in a non-religious state, would you want to have a non religious bureau to select the commander of the police station of your town, or would you rather have the town residents to elect the commander?

You definitely would not want to have a police station which jurisdiction spans across 20 miles, and some bureau from a 100 miles away, of which people you do not know of, be the authority to select the commander of that police station, rather than the communities and people within the subject jurisdiction.

Jamahiriya Of Libya

Former captain, Mr. Mu`ammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Qadhafi or Colonel Qadhafi, has established in Libya a system which is called Jamahiriya.

The word Jamahiriya translates to "state of the masses" and means "authority of the people".

The Jamahiriya was sometimes referred to as "direct democracy".

It appears that this system was good, and that system served the people of Libya well; so well, to an extent that NATO and the federal government of USA have conspired to topple the Libyan regime.

Sheriffs In USA

Reviewing of the Sheriff system in USA.

TBD

Conclusion

Even dictatorships and especially monarchies, are better than democracies.

Democracies could easily be made into invisible dictatorships under the guise of democracy, which is worst than any other system, especially because the principle of "Policy Of Certainty" is nullified.

You must be having political systems which you would know how authorities and powers are allocated and how you can influence and also audit them.

Otherwise, you are a senseless subject.