IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Friday, April 26, 2024

back to Techrights (Main Index)

1 AM, April 26

01:52 *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

01:57 *x-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@qezxp5nudz5uq.irc) has joined #techbytes

2 AM, April 26

02:22 schestowitz[TR2]; http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/04/upckat-preliminary-injunctions-in-upc.html?showComment=1713882386319#c4896931614273185288

↺ http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/04/upckat-preliminary-injunctions-in-upc.html?showComment=1713882386319#c4896931614273185288

02:22 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | [UPCKat] Preliminary injunctions in the UPC: CUP&CINO v Alpina Coffee Systems - The IPKat

02:22 schestowitz[TR2]; "The present decision of the UPC has been commented in another blog.<br /><br />The patent monopoly on which the request for a PI was not opposed. <br /><br />It is interesting to note that when applying Art 69 and the protocol, the Vienna local section of the UPC read into independent claim 2 limitations which were not contained in it. <br /><br />This is in clear contradiction with a long line of case law of the boards of appeal

02:22 schestowitz[TR2]; of the EPO according to which it is not allowed to read into the claims a limitation only present in description. <br /><br />Can we see here first divergences between the case law of the UPC and of the boards of appeal of the EPO in matters of interpretation of claims? <br /><br />Independent clam 2 is silent about the minimum length of the line section downstream of the throttle. It simply claims that the diameter of the line sec

02:22 schestowitz[TR2]; tions upstream and downstream of the throttle are different. <br /><br />According to [0032] of the description, the difference in diameter is only preferable, whereas the length of the downstream line should, in order to achieve the effect of homogenisation of the milk foam, be at least be 0,5 m. It can go up to 2m, but is preferably 1,50 m. <br /><br />Something seems to have gone wrong during examination."

5 AM, April 26

05:28 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes

6 AM, April 26

06:09 DaemonFC; Most of the rest of the world is fucked up worse than we are, or at least in other ways.

06:10 DaemonFC; I'd rather take my chances with "gun violence" than live in such a shitfuckinghellhole as most other English speaking countries where you can be arrested for offending people.

06:10 *Rodney_ has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)

06:11 DaemonFC; I was talking to John today about Canada. He said the Canadian border patrol people are nice and then when you're coming back into the US, ours are really really mean.

06:11 DaemonFC; I said the Canadian ones are used to biting their tongue because it's the law.

06:11 DaemonFC; The American ones are mean because they have to deal with so many Canadians all day.

06:13 DaemonFC; Every time I see TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew in the news I start singing Suzie Q by CCR.

06:13 DaemonFC; :P

06:38 *gyemsz (~DaxSon@freenode-2ue.6ih.pu7h8v.IP) has joined #techbytes

7 AM, April 26

07:41 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; <li>

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; <h5><a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2024/04/dan-solove-on-privacy-regulation.html">Dan Solove on Privacy Regulation</a></h5>

↺ https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2024/04/dan-solove-on-privacy-regulation.html">Dan

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; <blockquote>

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; <p>Law professor Dan Solove has a new article on privacy regulation. In his email to me, he writes: Ive been pondering privacy consent for more than a decade, and I think I finally made a breakthrough with this article. His mini-abstract: </p>

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; <p> "In this Article I argue that most of the time, privacy consent is fictitious. Instead of futile efforts to try to turn privacy consent from fiction to fact, the better approach is to lean into the fictions. The law cant stop privacy consent from being a fairy tale, but the law can ensure that the story ends well. I argue that privacy consent should confer less legitimacy and p

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; ower and that it be backstopped by a set of duties on organizations that process personal data based on consent." </p>

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; </blockquote>

07:48 schestowitz[TR2]; </li>

07:49 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Dan Solove on Privacy Regulation - Schneier on Security

07:49 schestowitz[TR2]; DaemonFC: yeah, i know

8 AM, April 26

08:16 DaemonFC; schestowitz[TR2]: Lobster is writing about you.

08:16 DaemonFC; He's so creepy he can probably identify the brand of pepper spray by how it burns.

08:21 schestowitz[TR2]; it can only waste time

08:21 schestowitz[TR2]; unless you ignore

08:24 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

08:26 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

08:27 schestowitz[TR2]; "Malala Yousafzai confirms support for Palestine after backlash over musical with Hillary Clinton"

08:27 schestowitz[TR2]; x https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/4619597-malala-yousafzai-confirms-support-for-palestine-after-backlash-over-musical-with-hillary-clinton/

↺ https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/4619597-malala-yousafzai-confirms-support-for-palestine-after-backlash-over-musical-with-hillary-clinton/

08:27 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes- ( status 403 @ https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/4619597-malala-yousafzai-confirms-support-for-palestine-after-backlash-over-musical-with-hillary-clinton/ )

↺ https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/4619597-malala-yousafzai-confirms-support-for-palestine-after-backlash-over-musical-with-hillary-clinton/

08:32 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

08:34 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

08:52 DaemonFC; schestowitz[TR2]: I came across the 2008 listing for this building.

08:52 DaemonFC; They called it a beauty and a well oiled machine.

08:53 DaemonFC; Nobody's changed the oil since 1977, but it's well oiled you know.

9 AM, April 26

09:55 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes

09:56 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes

10 AM, April 26

10:01 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes

10:02 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes

10:28 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

10:39 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

11 AM, April 26

11:06 *Moocher5254 (~quassel@6i8ckjmvfhgyw.irc) has joined #techbytes

11:54 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

11:55 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

noon, April 26

12:08 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes

2 PM, April 26

14:56 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes

4 PM, April 26

16:34 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes

16:54 *jacobk (~quassel@32hz32it3ih2k.irc) has joined #techbytes

5 PM, April 26

17:17 schestowitz[TR2]; http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/04/upckat-preliminary-injunctions-in-upc.html?showComment=1714031895712#c5563267725905785615

↺ http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/04/upckat-preliminary-injunctions-in-upc.html?showComment=1714031895712#c5563267725905785615

17:17 schestowitz[TR2]; "It seems that the Vienna LD very reasonably applies the same logic as used in the German &quot;Spannschraube&quot; decision - the bare meaning of the words of the claim may encompass the alleged infringing act but if read with the eyes of a skilled person in the light of the description, the words used have a particular meaning in the context of the patent."

17:17 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | [UPCKat] Preliminary injunctions in the UPC: CUP&CINO v Alpina Coffee Systems - The IPKat

17:18 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes

17:24 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

17:25 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

17:25 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes

17:57 *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

6 PM, April 26

18:11 *jacobk (~quassel@2j2enej2k6pt4.irc) has joined #techbytes

18:39 *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > Hi Roy,

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > Cheers for inclusing our last posting in the Tux links.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > These are great sources on high level scepticism of Microsoft's

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > security record, thanks for digging them up! I commented on Schniere's

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > site with these as links.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > At some point we'll do a cybershow segment on it, as Microsoft

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > certainly have a*spectacular* track record of security failure, and

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > to ever trust that company going forward would be madness.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > But I don't want to just pile on Microsoft through, for the simple

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > reason that it's distracting from a larger picture that all the Big

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > Tech companies are an enormous cybersecurity risk. Even if you just

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > factor out al the politics the problems are baked into the scale,

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > profit motives and (lack of proper) sofware angineering practices.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > Google escape this kind of talk, because of their proximity ti US

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > defence money. They are equally problematic to the common civic

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > cybersecurity of the average citizen.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > Perhaps in the future we can look at what each Big Tech organisation

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > has in common. to see the threat more generally. I think that makes

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > the analysis and arguments more powerful.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > Later we're releasing a (I hope) rather interesting extended episode

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > on CCTV and crime. I am not sure how well it fits with Techrights

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > themes but we'd lve you guys to give it a listen.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; >

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; > cheers,

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; This sounds like a super-relevant episode for us to comment on.

18:55 schestowitz[TR2]; Regarding CCTV, 2013: http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2013/05/25/surveillance/

↺ http://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2013/05/25/surveillance/

18:56 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-schestowitz.com Blog Archive CCTV Not Effective

7 PM, April 26

19:53 *parsifal (~parsifal@uuar9r28yasyu.irc) has joined #techbytes

10 PM, April 26

22:12 *x-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

22:23 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes

11 PM, April 26

23:55 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

23:56 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Friday, April 26, 2024

back to Techrights (Main Index)