IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Thursday, December 22, 2022

back to Techrights (Main Index)

beginning of new day, December 22

00:43 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

00:50 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

1 AM, December 22

01:46 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

01:48 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

2 AM, December 22

02:07 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

02:13 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

02:17 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

02:34 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

3 AM, December 22

03:00 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

03:04 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

03:08 schestowitz; Public procurement EU rules on electronic invoicing in public procurement

03:08 schestowitz; > FYI, the "Public procurement EU rules on electronic invoicing in

03:08 schestowitz; > public procurement" part is probably highly relevant.

03:08 schestowitz; >

03:08 schestowitz; >

03:08 schestowitz; > -------- Forwarded Message --------

03:08 schestowitz; > Subject: 'Have your say' - Notification

03:08 schestowitz; > Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 22:07:04 +0100

03:08 schestowitz; > From: European Commission - 'Have your say' <DO-NOT-REPLY@ec.europa.eu>

03:08 schestowitz; > To: xxxxx@xxx.xxx

03:08 schestowitz; >

03:08 schestowitz; > Europa Mail

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > European Commission

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > Have your say

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > Dear Sir or Madam,

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > Several initiatives have been published or updated on the European

03:09 schestowitz; > Commission's 'Have your say' portal:

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > For your information: events that do not open a feedback opportunity.

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > Title Topic Action

03:09 schestowitz; > Other Actions

03:09 schestowitz; > Single market new EU instrument to guarantee functioning of single

03:09 schestowitz; > market during emergencies

03:09 schestowitz; > <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13181-Single-market-new-EU-instrument-to-guarantee-functioning-of-single-market-during-emergencies_en> Single market

↺ https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13181-Single-market-new-EU-instrument-to-guarantee-functioning-of-single-market-during-emergencies_en>

03:09 schestowitz; > Final summary report published

03:09 schestowitz; > Single market Proposal for a legislative initiative on cross-border

03:09 schestowitz; > activities of associations

03:09 schestowitz; > <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13538-Single-market-Proposal-for-a-legislative-initiative-on-cross-border-activities-of-associations_en> Single market

↺ https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13538-Single-market-Proposal-for-a-legislative-initiative-on-cross-border-activities-of-associations_en>

03:09 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ec.europa.eu | Have your say

03:09 schestowitz; > Final summary report published

03:09 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ec.europa.eu | Have your say

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > Planned initiative

03:09 schestowitz; > Public procurement EU rules on electronic invoicing in public

03:09 schestowitz; > procurement (evaluation)

03:09 schestowitz; > <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13669-Public-procurement-EU-rules-on-electronic-invoicing-in-public-procurement-evaluation-_en> Single market

↺ https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13669-Public-procurement-EU-rules-on-electronic-invoicing-in-public-procurement-evaluation-_en>

03:09 schestowitz; > Published for information

03:09 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ec.europa.eu | Have your say

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > To consult all the existing initiatives please visit the portal:

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say_en

↺ https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say_en

03:09 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ec.europa.eu | Have your say

03:09 schestowitz; > <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say_en>

↺ https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say_en>

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > This is an automatic notification message. Please do not reply to it.

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:09 schestowitz; > With kind regards,

03:09 schestowitz; >

03:10 schestowitz; > *European Commission *

03:10 schestowitz; > Secretariat-General

03:12 schestowitz; ----

03:12 schestowitz; >>> Are there any less obvious names or keywords that are worth searching

03:12 schestowitz; >>> for?

03:12 schestowitz; >> I try never to name clients or colleagues. It would darken the series

03:12 schestowitz; >> somewhat.

03:12 schestowitz; > Agreed, I wasn't encouraging you to do so

03:12 schestowitz; >

03:12 schestowitz; > Sooner or later you'll be able search the whole of debian-private

03:12 schestowitz; > without going through any middleman.

03:12 schestowitz; They already voted in favour of releasing them. They just didn't follow their own policy. :-)

03:12 schestowitz; > What you describe at Sirius is not actually that unusual. On the one

03:12 schestowitz; > hand, it is normal for business owners to be creative and try to find

03:12 schestowitz; > new ways to do things. On the other hand, there is a subset of small

03:12 schestowitz; > business owners out there who don't seem to realize what they can and

03:12 schestowitz; > can't get away with.

03:12 schestowitz; Yes, I am fully aware it is "not actually that unusual."

03:12 schestowitz; I said this several times before.

03:12 schestowitz; That is why I write about it. It's a cautionary tale.

03:12 schestowitz; > Personally, I never wrote about my clients or employers. The clients

03:12 schestowitz; > and employers universally value the feedback I give them about open

03:12 schestowitz; > source communities because they don't see those organizations as

03:12 schestowitz; > employers. But if I wrote about one client then other clients may feel

03:12 schestowitz; > they could be next.

03:12 schestowitz; >

03:12 schestowitz; > Regards,

03:12 schestowitz; Yes, more importantly the clients are not who I complain about. They helped pay my salary. The payslips came from a sort of 'mitm'.

03:17 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

03:19 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

03:26 schestowitz; Re: EPO Exchange of building against privileges

03:26 schestowitz; > Hi,

03:26 schestowitz; >

03:26 schestowitz; > Do you know some specialists in corruption who could give us their

03:26 schestowitz; > opinion on the potential passive corruption by the EPO of the dutch

03:26 schestowitz; > state, they exchanged fiscal privileges against the promise to construct

03:26 schestowitz; > this building.

03:26 schestowitz; >

03:26 schestowitz; > I don't want to accuse them without having a near certainty that it is

03:26 schestowitz; > passive corruption.

03:26 schestowitz; I spoke to an intl' lawyer based in spain who looked into msft and epo violating privacy law and covering that up?

03:26 schestowitz; suitable contact for you?

03:39 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

03:44 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

03:50 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

4 AM, December 22

04:00 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

04:16 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

04:20 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

04:25 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

04:31 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

04:57 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

5 AM, December 22

05:02 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

05:11 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

05:12 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

05:29 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

05:34 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

05:38 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

05:49 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

7 AM, December 22

07:32 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

07:43 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

8 AM, December 22

08:42 *onix (~959c48e0@q8ban9vyag5t6.irc) has joined #techbytes

08:46 onix; hi, you might find interesting the case of Chrome removal of JPEG XL (e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jyk87VVfh9s ) - enforcing worse proprietary AVIF (controlled by a few corporations, with defensive patent license termination), and missing many features JPEG XL has: https://cloudinary.com/blog/the-case-for-jpeg-xl

↺ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jyk87VVfh9s
↺ https://cloudinary.com/blog/the-case-for-jpeg-xl

08:46 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-@Invidious: https://invidious.privacy.gd/watch?v=Jyk87VVfh9s

↺ https://invidious.privacy.gd/watch?v=Jyk87VVfh9s

08:46 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-Connection timed out after 10001 milliseconds ( status 0 @ https://invidious.privacy.gd/watch?v=Jyk87VVfh9s )

↺ https://invidious.privacy.gd/watch?v=Jyk87VVfh9s

08:46 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-cloudinary.com | The Case for JPEG XL

9 AM, December 22

09:05 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

09:12 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

09:15 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

09:23 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes

09:24 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes

09:26 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

10 AM, December 22

10:26 *onix has quit (Quit: https://mibbit.com Online IRC Client)

↺ https://mibbit.com

10:31 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

10:39 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

10:53 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

10:59 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

11 AM, December 22

11:13 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

11:19 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

1 PM, December 22

13:04 *Mio14 (~quassel@freenode-7au.v1i.imvltv.IP) has joined #techbytes

13:24 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

13:25 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

13:32 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)

13:37 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

13:46 *u-amarsh04 has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

2 PM, December 22

14:00 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@uvxvchtayzkvk.irc) has joined #techbytes

5 PM, December 22

17:03 schestowitz; Happy Holidays and Article: 2022

17:03 schestowitz; > Hi Roy,

17:03 schestowitz; Hello again :-)

17:03 schestowitz; > Glad the article resonates but sad for you that you are

17:03 schestowitz; > driven to leave, as are so many of my colleagues. These

17:03 schestowitz; > are dark times for academia.

17:03 schestowitz; Yes, but I did the right thing and don't have any regrets. I've been planning to leave for about a year already.

17:03 schestowitz; > The article belongs to the Times, but I can give you a slightly better

17:03 schestowitz; > version :) Under a different title, modified and re-written from the

17:03 schestowitz; > original drafts.

17:03 schestowitz; Yes, that's what I reckoned.

17:03 schestowitz; In 2006-08 I used to contribute paid articles to media (they even paid up to $200 per piece... a lot of money back then), but they edited out things I wanted to keep and even twisted my original headlines to make annoying clickbait.

17:03 schestowitz; And yes, when I say "edited out things I wanted to keep" I mean some factual things about habitual "advertiser"... Microsoft.

17:03 schestowitz; > The Times limit me to 900 words, but I know your readers are accepting of

17:03 schestowitz; > slightly longer form.

17:03 schestowitz; Sometimes I'd keep two versions, long and short or "professional" (censored) and honest.

17:03 schestowitz; > If I did that I could incorporate some of your reasons and observations

17:03 schestowitz; > too. Would you be able to promote it widely as you did with one of my

17:03 schestowitz; > ealier articles that got a lot of eyes-on.

17:03 schestowitz; Yes, of course. BTW, Gemini is still alive and kicking. 3000+ capsules now. It was ~1800 a year ago, IIRC.

17:03 schestowitz; > all very best,

17:03 schestowitz; Cheers.

17:37 *netter_ (~netter@mii8cedt3f3mk.irc) has joined #techbytes

6 PM, December 22

18:05 *netter_ has quit (Quit: Leaving)

7 PM, December 22

19:59 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)

8 PM, December 22

20:21 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes

9 PM, December 22

21:03 *_Mio14 (~quassel@freenode-nq6.1mh.2jtbps.IP) has joined #techbytes

21:04 *Mio14 has quit (Ping timeout: 120 seconds)

IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Thursday, December 22, 2022

back to Techrights (Main Index)