Reply to Sandra from idiomdrottning.org: You don't have to!

⇑ Initial article

Sandra from idiomdrottning.org made a small reply to my docks-proposal on her tinylog:

2023-01-18 16:30
Stop pulling my hair please. I don’t wanna keep on fiddle endlessly with these cockamamie proposals. Just no.

Sorry for making you feel uncomfortable. But guess what: You don't have to fiddle with my proposal anyway.

You sound like I made a proposal for changing and extending the gemini protocol specification. No I didn't. I just proposed an optional mechanism on top of it to solve a specific problem. Nothing breaks if you don't implement it. In your case it is even better: It makes no difference whether you implement it or not, even if search engines would adapt my proposed mechanism one day

To be a little bit more specific: Your capsule is compliant with the default assumption, that a capsule is equal to a domain. Therefore, it wouldn't change anything if you added a .dock.gmi to your site. It would be relevant for the use cases I mentioned in my article.

Have a nice day!

Feel free to respond or comment via e-mail:

300nm@derschwarzestrahler.at
CC BY-SA 4.0 Martin Marot-Perz, 2023-01-19
⇑ Initial article
⇑⇒ relog.gmi RE:log
⇑⇑ Gemlog
    ╭────────╮    ╔═════╗
  ╭─╯████████╰─╮  ╔═══╗ ╚═╗
 ╭╯████████████╰╮ ╔══╗╚═╗ ╚╗
╭╯██████████████╰╮╔═╗╚╗ ╚╗ ╚╗
│████████████████   ║ ║  ║  ║
╰╮██████████████╭╯╚═╝╔╝ ╔╝ ╔╝
 ╰╮████████████╭╯ ╚══╝╔═╝ ╔╝
  ╰─╮████████╭─╯  ╚═══╝ ╔═╝
    ╰────────╯    ╚═════╝