Distinguishing Managing Agents from Management Companies
TBD
Managing Agents:
- generally for-profit
- almost never (ever?) public limited companies
- operate at multiple sites across the country
- would tend to have SIC codes like 68320
- individual homeowners would not be members/shareholders
- file accounts which show they are companies operating with employees, own assets and cashflow
- tend to have their own websites and branding
Management Companies (particularly Residents Management Companies):
- generally not-for-profit (company limited by guarantee, or company with shares but with a ban on profit distribution)
- articles of association restrict objects of company to managing/owning a specific site
- membership tends to be "referrable" to ownership of flats / houses at a specific block or estate; a very common pattern is for "dwelling" and "dwellingholder" to be defined in the articles, in relation to a specific site
- membership might not be easily able to be resigned/refused
- provisions for mortgagees and executors to become members if they end up owning the referrable home
- would tend to have SIC codes like 98000
- tend to be dormant companies without own assets, employees or cashflow
- tend not to have own websites or branding or contact information
- may well have a company name that reflects the site managed, e.g., "Little Bowden Rise (Market Harborough) Management Company Limited"
- may have "golden share" provisions that are triggered by home sales
MCs would tend be the customers of MAs; never the reverse