Techrights

The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is Being Attacked by Organisations Jealous of Its Principled Stance and Longevity

Posted by Roy Schestowitz on Sep 03, 2025,

updated Sep 03, 2025

Preparations for Our 19th Anniversary Have Already Begun
If You Reject the Google Verdict in the US, Then You Should Also Reject the "Modern" Web (Do Something About It)
HTTPS image: This is a Filipino metaphor which relates to a bucket of crabs. If there is one crab in a bucket it’ll easily escape from it. However, when there’s a cast of crabs in a bucket they’ll all prevent one another from climbing out. They’ll reach up and pull each other down. If they worked together then they would be able to escape, but they don’t. It’s a ‘if I’m not getting out, neither are you’ attitude‘.

Over the years there have been several failed copycats of the FSF. We wrote about some of them. None lasted very long and one splinter group looks like it'll be insolvent rather soon (associating with toxic people and taking money from Microsoft [1, 2] cannot be helpful). The FSF will soon mature past 40 and the misleadingly named "FSFE" rapidly perishes after making Microsoft its top sponsor [1, 2, 3, 4]. Its blog has been barely active this year (we check this every week) and it's scarcely mentioned anywhere, it's virtually invisible in the media. It shot its own foot, relegating itself to assured irrelevancy.

looks like it'll be insolvent rather soon
associating with toxic people
HTTPS: 1
HTTPS: 2
FSF will soon mature past 40
HTTPS: misleadingly named "FSFE"
1
2
3
4

The way I see it, the people who attack RMS (the founder of the FSF) are typically jealous hypocrites, who try to attack instead of befriend people "above them". It's a hallmark of sociopathic attitudes (the "crab mentality") and it extends to the institutional level, hence the persistent attacks on the FSF and its credibility. Maybe even its servers, which became hard to reach.

↺ HTTPS: RMS
sociopathic
Maybe even its servers
became hard to reach

We never attacked the FSF, albeit we POLITELY criticised it when it made obvious errors (which it later came to regret itself). Nobody is perfect, but imperfection does not instantaneously imply sinister intent, complicity etc. █

HTTPS: POLITELY criticised it when it made obvious errors
↺ HTTPS: does not
HTTPS: █
HTTPS image: My Disagreement With the FSF Over UEFI 'Secure Boot'
gemini.techrights.org