IRC: #techbytes @ Techrights IRC Network: Tuesday, January 23, 2024
1 AM, January 23
01:02 *jacobk has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
2 AM, January 23
02:20 *u-amarsh04 has quit (connection closed)
3 AM, January 23
03:02 *SaphirJD has quit (connection closed)
03:33 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
03:34 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes
7 AM, January 23
07:54 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
07:54 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes
8 AM, January 23
08:44 *SaphirJD (~SaphirJD@3d4grvkztv9j4.irc) has joined #techbytes
11 AM, January 23
11:53 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
noon, January 23
12:21 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
12:59 *u-amarsh04 (~amarsh04@dc77dxzcmjmaq.irc) has joined #techbytes
1 PM, January 23
13:04 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
13:07 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
2 PM, January 23
14:00 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
14:03 *Noisytoot has quit (Ping timeout: 2m30s)
14:03 *Noisytoot (~noisytoot@tkbibjhmbkvb8.irc) has joined #techbytes
14:30 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
14:53 *psydroid2 (~psydroid@u8ftxtfux23wk.irc) has joined #techbytes
3 PM, January 23
15:12 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has left #techbytes
15:16 *psydruid (~psydruid@jevhxkzmtrbww.irc) has joined #techbytes
6 PM, January 23
18:36 *SaphirJD has quit (connection closed)
18:36 *SaphirJD (~SaphirJD@3d4grvkztv9j4.irc) has joined #techbytes
7 PM, January 23
19:28 *psydroid2 has quit (Quit: KVIrc 5.0.0 Aria http://www.kvirc.net/)
10 PM, January 23
22:10 schestowitz[TR]; http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2024/01/cjeu-damage-claim-for-unlawful.html?showComment=1705948152053#c1572670065851161898
22:10 -TechBytesBot/#techbytes-ipkitten.blogspot.com | CJEU: Damage claim for unlawful provisional measures may be based on strict liability - The IPKat
22:10 schestowitz[TR]; "While IPKat M. Pensel seems more akin with TM, the present decision of the CJEU was about a SPC, which can be considered as a derivative of a patent.<br /><br />What applies to a rescinded PI on a SPC should apply mutatis mutandis to a rescinded PI on a patent. <br /><br />For instance, before granting a PI, the UPC would be well inspired to look whether there is an opposition pending at the EPO and what is the final result,
22:10 schestowitz[TR]; i.e. not the ODs decision, but that of a BA. From published decisions of the boards, it appears that a large proportion of decisions of ODs are set aside by boards. <br /><br />If the opposition has just started, it appears important that the UPC evaluates itself the validity of the patent monopoly on the basis of the prior art filed by the opponent and the position thereon of the patentee. This evaluation will not be binding
22:10 schestowitz[TR]; on the EPO, but diverging decisions on validity of the patent monopoly between the UPC and the EPO should be avoided. <br /><br />The UPC has been geared for quick decisions, but this increases the risk of diverging decisions on validity as the last word on it is, in case of an opposition, at the EPO and not at the UPC."
11 PM, January 23
23:24 *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term)
23:24 *acer-box has quit (Quit: Konversation term)
23:24 *acer-box has quit (Quit: Konversation term)
23:24 *schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@24axkg87jqny6.irc) has joined #techbytes
23:24 *acer-box (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes
23:24 *acer-box (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes
23:30 *schestowitz-TR2 has quit (Quit: Konversation term)
23:30 *acer-box has quit (Quit: Konversation term)
23:30 *acer-box has quit (Quit: Konversation term)
23:30 *schestowitz-TR2 (~acer-box@24axkg87jqny6.irc) has joined #techbytes
23:30 *acer-box (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes
23:30 *acer-box (~acer-box@freenode/user/schestowitz) has joined #techbytes