Re: Intend to standardize via RFC?

Message headers

From: Christian Seibold <krixano@mailbox.org>

Subject: Re: Intend to standardize via RFC?

Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 02:24:23 -0500

Message-ID: <ta3db7$12np$1@gioia.aioe.org>

On 5/30/2022 6:54 PM, danrl wrote:

On 2022-05-30, Szczezuja.space <szczezuja@sdf.org> wrote:

> On 2022-05-30, Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl> wrote:

>> Furthermore, the specification is a bit blurry around the edges

>> as Stephane Bortzmeyer pointed out a while ago.

>

> Could you write something more. Is it on this group? I can't find it

> probably.

Here you go:

=> gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/gemini/missing.gmi

Some of the things on that page have already been fixed. Other things

are more questioning the spec (particularly TOFU), and other things have

had fairly active discussions (URIs) on the repos. Also, this list

doesn't look like it's getting updated often.

Parent:

Start of thread: