Re: Geminisphere via backlinks

Message headers

From: Matthew Ernisse <matt@going-flying.com>

Subject: Re: Geminisphere via backlinks

Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 23:35:43 -0000 (UTC)

Message-ID: <slrnt4s8uf.5ci.matt@imladris.colo.ub3rgeek.net>

Message content

On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:32:42 +0200, bacardi55 wrote:

It isn't popular at all and most responses I got where negative but
the concept works (and is in place on my capsule) 🤷.

I remember seeing this a while back, probably via CAPCOM or Antenna.

One of the sentiments that struck me, which seems to be a common theme

these days is this bit from your post:

A "simple" solution would be going to the capsule, find the contact
of the author and send an email… But not every capsule has a contact
page and the process is very manual, requiring to use another tool and
protocol to communicate.

It seems to me that the whole point of application protocols like e-mail,

IRC, netnews, and Gemini itself is to accomplish a specific task. Yes, you

can extend most of them to do what the other does (I used to run an IRC to

e-mail bridge for reasons best left to history) but why? Anything powerful

enough to run Gemini can certainly run e-mail or netnews.

I'd love to know the source of the sentiment and if it happens to be an

aversion to 'switching applications', I'm sure a member of the church of

emacs will step up with alacrity.

--Matt

--

"The avalanche has started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote."

--Kosh

Related

Parent:

Re: Geminisphere via backlinks (by bacardi55 <bac@rdi55.pl> on Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:32:42 +0200)

Start of thread:

Geminisphere via backlinks (by Plain Text <text@sdfeu.org> on Sat, 26 Feb 2022 20:23:45 -0000 (UTC))

Children:

Re: Geminisphere via backlinks (by meff <email@example.com> on Thu, 7 Apr 2022 04:14:19 -0000 (UTC))
Re: Geminisphere via backlinks (by bacardi55 <bac@rdi55.pl> on Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:13:22 +0200)