Comment by 😺 gemalaya

Re: "misfin link specification proposal"
In: s/misfin

Thank you @satch for this proposal. I've made the changes in gemalaya. I think commas for delimiting addresses are ideal.

I wonder about the format of the query string. mailto: links use named query parameters (subject=, body=, cc=, etc ..). For misfin maybe we don't really need to pass anything else than a message body in the query string ? Using named query params has some advantages if we want to pass other values in the future.

😺 gemalaya

2024-10-18 · 1 year ago

Original Post

🌒 s/misfin
— libera.chat at ##misfin

misfin link specification proposal — So after some discussion in IRC as well as careful reading of the relevant parts of RFC 3986, here's what we've come up with: misfin:// links must not be used like mailto: links to trigger the client composing a message. This is because the // portion indicates that the address is the *authority* portion of the link, which is accurate when a client is making a misfin:// request to a server but...

💬 satch · 27 comments · 3 likes · 2024-10-10 · 1 year ago